Funny you should feel this way considering all the hundreds and hundreds if not thousands of positive studies done on ascorbic acid and the work of Linus Pauling.Ascorbic acid is unstable. In my opinion, that makes it worthless; even for its shelf life.
It is better to supplement with vitamin C from rose hips or acerola cherry. You can even find this inexpensively from Wal-Mart.
Far better than any of the above, - amla.
https://www.raysahelian.com/amla.html
https://www.webmd.com/vitamins-supplements/ingredientmono-784-INDIAN+GOOSEBERRY.aspx?activeIngredientId=784&activeIngredientName=INDIAN+GOOSEBERRY&source=3
If ascorbic acid comes from GMO corn, how can that be a good thing?I'm in total agreement with Arrowwind09. Ascorbic acid is a good source of vitamin C. I'm also in agreement that liposomol vitamin C is the creme de la creme of C.
Rose hips and acerola C is extremely expensive. The vitamin C advertised to contain either of these is what is called pixie dust. A little bit added to a vat justifys the claim on the label that it contains it.
It is not the wrong vitamin C. It is just that you don't really know what MG it is after a while. It is also heat sensitive as well. I'd say it is probably already well degraded by the time it hits the market shelves. It rapidly oxidizes in aqueous systems.Thanks for the link, Jim! I guess what I'm taking has been the wrong Vit C.
1000mg capsules - at least 2 daily from Solgar. Listed as L-Ascorbic acid.
Also says free of Corn, yeast,wheat,soy, dairy products, preservatives, artificial flavors/colors. www.solgar.com
I suspect that they were careful to use a specifically manufactured and preserved ascorbic acid in their thousand clinical trials. Much like the iodine doctors did in theirs by creating Iodoral to control the trial exactly to their specifications.Funny you should feel this way considering all the hundreds and hundreds if not thousands of positive studies done on ascorbic acid and the work of Linus Pauling.
If things were urgent I would go for the new lipsomal vitamin c from Livon Labs.
But for regular home users, it depends upon how and when they use and store it. Although the following quote regards the storage of ascorbic acid for administration to patients, it is another reason why I don't like multivitamins. Yes, I know the supplement can be by itself; but most take it with food or other supplements. I'd rather use a whole food source of vitamin C.Ascorbic acid is extremely unstable in vitro. It reduces other radicals including the hydroxyl radical, organic alkoxyl and peroxyl radicals, urate radical, tocopherol radical, and the ferric and cupric ions. It readily oxidizes to dehydro-ascorbate in a two step reaction. When the ascorbate anion loses one electron, it becomes an ascorbate radical, A·. https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/life-science/cell-culture/learning-center/media-expert/ascorbate.html
Ascorbic acid stability in TPN infusions in 3-litre plastic bags was examined. Vitamin C was found to degrade slowly in mixtures which do not contain trace elements. In the presence of copper, degradation proceeds rapidly until dissolved oxygen is depleted. Reducing the copper concentration had only a minor influence on degradation rate. However, this copper-catalyzed reaction was prevented if cysteine was present in the TPN regimen. The amount of ascorbic acid degraded depended on the dissolved oxygen content of the infusion, the amount of residual air in the bag after filling and the permeability of the plastic to oxygen. In the absence of copper, 20–30 mg ascorbic acid was broken down within 24 h at ambient temperatures, but if copper was present, 150–200 mg was degraded within 2–4 h. The contribution of dehydroascorbic acid to the amount of vitamin C delivered to the patient was negligible. It is concluded that either vitamin C and trace element injections containing copper should not be added to the same bag, or an adequate coverage of ascorbic acid must be included to allow for losses by oxidation before and during administration. https://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119853682/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
Try here. Bulk organic rose hips. Does not even require as much mg to match ascorbic acid. https://www.mountainroseherbs.com/bulkherb/r.php#h_r_hpRose hips and acerola C is extremely expensive. The vitamin C advertised to contain either of these is what is called pixie dust. A little bit added to a vat justifys the claim on the label that it contains it.
The problem is simply you can't get enough natural c every day. The best form is camu camu, but even with that, 500 mg would be the size of a golf ball, so imagine taking 20,000 mg per day... just not possible.
Pauling showed us that ascorbic acid is not only beneficial in large doses, but is completely safe. Remember, he took straight ascorbic acid, not the more gentle ester C, nor did he take Quercetin, rose hips, camu, acai, etc.
To say ascorbic acid is worthless is wrong. It is a super star.
If you are talking about my remark, "Ascorbic acid is unstable. In my opinion, that makes it worthless; even for its shelf life.", check it for yourself. Try this standard high school test. Take some ascorbic acid. Separately subject it to heat, light, and moisture. Then follow this test. https://www.cforyourself.com/Overview/Primer/Chemistry/c_tests.htmlTo say ascorbic acid is worthless is wrong. It is a super star.
You can also read the reviews on Amazon and look inside.The relationship between vitamin C and health is controversial.
Double Nobel Prize winner, Linus Pauling, argued that ascorbate could prevent or cure heart disease, stroke, cancer and infections.
Conventional experts disagreed, disparaging supplements in favour of fruits and vegetables.
This book presents a new model, describing the action of vitamin C in health and disease.
It demonstrates conclusively that the establishment has misinterpreted the evidence, potentially resulting in epidemic levels of avoidable disease.
The dynamic flow model explains the current results and points the way for future experiments.
Vitamin C supplementation could eradicate many diseases.
In pharmacological doses, it could cure the major killers of the industrialised world.
to test these ideas may condemn countless people to chronic illness and premature death.
You would need to take much less amla than vitamin C.
So in cost analysis, which I am always thinking of
What does a 500mg tablet of alma cost and exactly how much vitamin c does it provide?
Can it compare to a standard bottle of ascorbic acid.
1 gm = 1000 mg100 gm. of Amla contains about 700 mg. of vitamin C.
...
Researchers have also shown that just 8.7 mg of natural vitamin C from Amla is equivalent to 100 mg of synthetic vitamin C. (for equivalence)
https://www.articlesfactory.com/articles/health/kanhaiya-amla-powder.html
https://excessive
I'm on your side PBD. That's why I said the excess would cause problems for people who have kidney problems. Those problems can cause them to not eliminate/flush properly.Excessive ascorbic acid does not cause kidney stones, that is a myth. The truth is that vitamin c will prevent kidney stones. There was a large study done to prove this.
Oh good, now we're cookin'! In order to convert glucose into ascorbic acid we need 4 essential enzymes to complete the task. Since we already have 3, (and there's enzymes manufactured for everything else) why do you suppose L-gulonolactone oxidase, the 4th enzyme needed to complete the biochemical pathway, hasn't been marketed?"saved1986 said:Chemist here (and I post on this board so you know I am not a big pharma or GMO fan).
Could you explain that, plz? In my mind synthetic ascorbic acid is not Vit C. The FDA gave the green flag to call it Vit C, but that doesn't change the fact that synthetic ascorbic acid is merely a fraction of natural Vit C. If Bioflavonoids, Factor K, Factor J, Factor P, Rutin, Tyrosinase, Ascorbinogen, and mineral co-factors are not present, there's no vitamin activity. Since ascorbic acid has been described as being the shell protecting the functional parts of the vitamin, how is okay to take alone? You figure when some of the other components are present, the body will draw on its own stores of the rest to make the vitamin complete. Over time, wouldn't taking synthetic ascorbic acid eventually cause deficiencies?saved1986 said:But Vit C in the form of straight synthesized ascorbic acid is ok (IMO).
He died of cancer....Pauling showed us that ascorbic acid is not only beneficial in large doses, but is completely safe. Remember, he took straight ascorbic acid, not the more gentle ester C, nor did he take Quercetin, rose hips, camu, acai, etc.
Of course its better to have the natural form for the co-factors , but straight ascorbic acid is fine. The only thing I will say (IMO) is if you take a natural form you will need less.Oh good, now we're cookin'! In order to convert glucose into ascorbic acid we need 4 essential enzymes to complete the task. Since we already have 3, (and there's enzymes manufactured for everything else) why do you suppose L-gulonolactone oxidase, the 4th enzyme needed to complete the biochemical pathway, hasn't been marketed?"
Could you explain that, plz? In my mind synthetic ascorbic acid is not Vit C. The FDA gave the green flag to call it Vit C, but that doesn't change the fact that synthetic ascorbic acid is merely a fraction of natural Vit C. If Bioflavonoids, Factor K, Factor J, Factor P, Rutin, Tyrosinase, Ascorbinogen, and mineral co-factors are not present, there's no vitamin activity. Since ascorbic acid has been described as being the shell protecting the functional parts of the vitamin, how is okay to take alone? You figure when some of the other components are present, the body will draw on its own stores of the rest to make the vitamin complete. Over time, wouldn't taking synthetic ascorbic acid eventually cause deficiencies?
Vitamins are supposed to assist the body and it seems logical to me that it would be less taxing on the body to consume the whole complex.