New Break Through In HIV Treatment

[Arrowwind09]

https://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,596242,00.html?test=latestnews

 

[athletic dept]

In spite of what the doctors say, HIV does not cause aids. HIV is just a low grade infection. It's the dozens of drugs people take when they have HIV that causes aids.

 

[pinballdoctor]

In spite of what the doctors say, HIV does not cause aids. HIV is just a low grade infection. It's the dozens of drugs people take when they have HIV that causes aids.

Absolutely!!

AIDS is not caused by a retro virus, nor is it sexually transmitted.

The best way to cure AIDS is to stop funding it!

 

[someguy]

Thats great.. does that mean they will have a vaccine that stops people from getting HIV?

And do you have to have HIV before getting aids? or can you get aids without getting hiv?

Could be an amazing breakthrough.. Western medicine has so much potential.. its a shame they put all there energy in the wrong direction most of the time.

 

[athletic dept]

Vaccines do not work and never have.

 

[Arrowwind09]

In my opinion HIV and AIDs are quite real conditions... try watching people die from it a few times and you will understand. I have seen whole families die of it being sexually transmitted from partner to husband to wife to unborn baby.

All you have to do is follow the trail.

They die with or without the drugs.

In the early days of HIV many many died. There were no HIV cocktails then... just death.

 

[pinballdoctor]

I have seen whole families die of it being sexually transmitted from partner to husband to wife to unborn baby.

This is not possible. AIDS is not transferred sexually... that is a myth.

AIDS is several diseases, all of which drain the immune system.

Most AIDS patients were diagnosed using the Western Blot test, which is a total fraud. Once diagnosed, these people were put on several drugs, and it was these drugs, especially AZT, that killed thousands.

AIDS is real, however, it is not caused by some mysterious retro virus, that just seems to attack poor people. AIDS in Africa is just a combination of several diseases they've always had, including TB, malaria, and from drinking contaminated water, while being under nourished.

Vaccines are useless. The very idea of trying to prevent sickness by injecting the body with mercury, aluminum, glycol antifreeze, animal DNA, antibiotics, squalene, live viruses, and toxic poisons is retarded.

That includes pet vaccines as well.

 

[Arrowwind09]

I think quite a few wealthy and middle class people have died from the HIV/AIDS complex also.

Here is another article that describes what they are looking into in more detail.
https://www.newsmaxhealth.com/health_stories/antibodies_HIV_neutralize/2010/07/09/329970.html?s=al&promo_code=A3E8-1

 

[pinballdoctor]

They are trying to develop another vaccine that will cure the fatal AIDS virus.

What a farce that is.

Billions of dollars have been spent on AIDS, more than cancer, heart disease, and diabetes combined, and they have yet to cure one AIDS patient!

Instead of passing out condoms to these poor Africans, they should be given mosquito screens for their houses, clean water to drink, decent food to eat, and proper treatments for TB, malaria, and parasite related illness.

AIDS is the second biggest medical blunder in our history.

Vaccines are the biggest.

 

[stilllife]

Aids was manufactured. There is a U.S. patent on it, anyone can read it online. Also there is a patented cure. It's been a while since I read it, but I encourage everyone to google 'US Patent for AIDS virus' or something similar. You will also come across articles detailing the history.

 

[Thee Phenom]

In my opinion HIV and AIDs are quite real conditions... try watching people die from it a few times and you will understand. I have seen whole families die of it being sexually transmitted from partner to husband to wife to unborn baby.

All you have to do is follow the trail.

They die with or without the drugs.

In the early days of HIV many many died. There were no HIV cocktails then... just death.

Well, you know what they say about opinions....

When dealing with scientific issues the best thing to do is rely on evidence and observations.

What is the evidence for the existence of 'HIV'?

The eveidence is that there is none.


What is the evidence that that AIDS is transmissible?

The evidence is that there is none.



HIV has never been isolated, never proven to exist. Lots of people have AIDS and no trace of what is called 'HIV'. How do you explain that, if HIV is the cause of AIDS?

The early AIDS cases in the west were restricted to gay males, more accurately the gay 'bottoms' that received anal intercourse.
Semen, when introduced into the bloodstream, causes immunodeficincy among other things. Not to mention the lubricants that were used, benezene based products and look at how toxic they are especially to the bone marrow. Then consider all of the bacteria that was introduced into the bloodstream from rectal hemorrhaging. Then consider all the STD's, antibiotics to treat the STD's and then all the rec drugs the gays were using in the disco era.

Don't forget all the nitrate 'poppers' that were the rage among gay bottoms to relax the sphincter to allow penetration. Poppers cause Kaposi's, and what was the number one AIDS defining illness in the western world circa 1985?

Kaposi's Sarcoma.

After a decade of that lifestyle is it any wonder that people became unhealthy??

Then enter the treatment of AIDS with the worst of all medications ever approved -AZT.
That stuff was so toxic when it was developed in 1957 that it was denied approval. It is a DNA terminator, and affects the quickest replicating cells in the body.
And which cells are those? Cells in the GI, red blood cells, and muscle cells.
Any coincidence that these early AIDS cases needed blood transfusions, lost incredible amounts of weight, and looked like death warmed over?

Retroviruses are not cytocidal. Never have been, and really aren't even viruses. In an AIDS patient that has just died less than 2% of the CD-4 immune cells are infected by so called HIV, which means that 98% of them are uninfected and can function normally.
But yet the immune system is allegedly destroyed by a tiny amount of 'virus' that is classified as one that has never killed anything.

Ask any infectious disease expert and they will telly you for a pathogenic virus to cause mortality at least 50% of the target cells must be infected.

Oh yeah, forgot to add that Gallo even said that of this extremely small amount of 'HIV' in the body about 96% of it is cell free. Which means, of course, that it is non infectious as it lacks the gp120 knobs (aka 'spikes) to gain entry into cells.
I don't care how much circulating virus is present if it can not infect than it is harmless and can not reproduce.

HIV is a sham. AIDS is a lifestyle disease. And that ain't contagious.

 

[saved1986]

The first aids drug was AZT. The clinical data was so biased it was ridiculous and more people died from that drug then from the disease.