Joe Byrne
Published: Saturday April 4, 2009

A team of nine scientists have unearthed startling data from dust gathered in the days and weeks after the World Trade Center towers collapsed on 9/11. They discovered that scattered throughout the dust samples were red and gray chips of 'active thermitic material', or an un-reacted pyrotechnic explosive.

Thermite is used in steel welding, fireworks shows, and hand grenades. It is the combination of a metal powder and a metal oxide which produce a reaction known for extremely high temperatures focused in a very small area for a short period of time. The 'active thermitic material' discovered in the World Trade Center dust was a combination of elemental aluminum and iron oxide, and is a form of thermite known as 'nano-structured super-thermite'.

“These observations reminded us of nano-thermite fabricated at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and elsewhere; available papers describe this material as an intimate mixture of UFG[Ultra-fine grain] aluminum and iron oxide in nano-thermite composites to form pyrotechnics or explosives. Commercially available thermite behaves as an incendiary when ignited, but when the ingredients are ultra-fine grain and are intimately mixed, this 'nano-thermite' reacts very rapidly, even explosively, and is sometimes referred to as 'super-thermite',” the report explains.

The full article in The Open Chemical Physics Journal can be found here.

Some of the authors of the paper have lost their jobs at universities and chemistry labs for their outspoken breakdown of what happened at the World Trade Center on 9/11. Kevin Ryan lost his job as a lab director after writing a letter to the National Institute for Standards and Technology(NIST was conducting an investigation into 9/11 at the time) challenging the common theory that burning jet fuel weakened the steel supports holding up the 110-story skyscrapers. Ryan claims that the owner of his laboratory subsidiary "was the company that certified the steel components used in the construction of the WTC buildings,” according to the South Bend Tribune. Dr. Steven E. Jones, a physicist at Brigham Young University, presented a paper in 2005 discussing alternative theories to the commonly accepted 'jet fuel' reasoning. In September 2006 he was placed on paid administrative leave and his paper was removed from the BYU database.

Jones has told Visibility911.com, "In short, the paper explodes the official story that 'no evidence' exists for explosive/pyrotechnic materials in the WTC buildings."

Parts of the report mention other studies being conducted by the scientists that will come out soon.

https://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/ this is who he is, it is not the banned study.

https://www.bentham-open.org/pages/co...001/7TOCPJ.SGM

The Raw Story | Study claims 'highly engineered explosive' found in WTC rubble
__________

__________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WA1nw...eature=related I'd Rather Go Blind
This is not medical advice. Just opinion. Whatever you decide to do your your health is strictly your business and your choice.
Visit www.HealthSalon.org

I�ve always had a problem with the �official story� of what happened, too many things just didn�t add up and or make sense. But like a leaky faucet stories like this keep dripping out. Eventually maybe enough of the truth will come out so that even the general public will realize that they have been lied to.

Yes the official story to 9-11 is full of holes.

Most people i talk to realise it was an inside job. But alsomost people are like sheep so they dont mind.

Building 7 did it for me .tOn the news they said building 7 had come down befor it had come down.

Either the news people are psychics or something very sinister happend that day. that has been hidden away.

The truth is like oil. It must come to the surface.

so why would someone or some government want to blow up the Twin Towers and blame a bearded fella with a stick on the other side of the world?

FOLLOW THE MONEY.

Yep, money, power, control through fear.

In one of the 9/11 debunking videos they said that building 7 was a repository for huge amounts of gold. All that gold had most conveniently been removed to the subbasement of a building across the street a couple of days before its destruction. I don't remember which video but I do think I posted its link here in Chit Chat some time ago. Most people don't recognize that building 7 was a world trade building also.

here's what Jones has to say. Insurance money may have been a lure to take it down
Silverstein, FDNY Decided to 'Pull WTC 7': An In-Depth Analysis

__________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WA1nw...eature=related I'd Rather Go Blind
This is not medical advice. Just opinion. Whatever you decide to do your your health is strictly your business and your choice.
Visit www.HealthSalon.org

An architectural engineer's view of 911.

https://www6.ae911truth.org/





As your own eyes witness � WTC Building #7 (a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane) exhibits all the characteristics of a classic controlled demolition with explosives: (and some non-standard characteristics)
1. Rapid onset of �collapse�
2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor - a full second prior to collapse
3. Symmetrical �collapse� � through the path of greatest resistance � at free-fall acceleration
4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed mostly in its own footprint
5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
6. Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses
7. Chemical signature of Thermite (high tech incendiary) found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples by physics professor Steven Jones, PhD.
8. FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples
9. Expert corroboration from the top European Controlled Demolition professional
10. Fore-knowledge of �collapse� by media, NYPD, FDNY
And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.
1. Slow onset with large visible deformations
2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never �collapsed�.

OMG! Look at that list of engineers and architects who signed that petition!
I will see what I can do to advance this. My husband recently retired from one of the largest architectural firms in the world and he knows a recent head of the A.I.A., having worked in the same company for over 20 years.

__________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WA1nw...eature=related I'd Rather Go Blind
This is not medical advice. Just opinion. Whatever you decide to do your your health is strictly your business and your choice.
Visit www.HealthSalon.org