Go Back   Natural Medicine Talk > Health > Women's Health

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-12-2010, 05:29 PM
kind2creatures's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,063
Blog Entries: 29
My Mood: Relaxed
kind2creatures will become famous soon enough
Exclamation Aamerican Cancer Society ties w/mammography device manufacturers

American cancer society maintains close financial ties to mammography radiation device manufacturers

by David Gutierrez, staff writer

(NaturalNews) The American Cancer Society (ACS) is involved financially with manufacturers of mammography devices, tainting its cancer screenings with conflict of interest, cancer prevention experts Samuel S. Epstein and Rosalie Bertell have charged.

Epstein is a medical doctor and the chairman of the Cancer Prevention Coalition. Bertell works with the organization International Physicians for Humanitarian Medicine.

"The mammography industry conducts research for the ACS and its grantees, serves on its advisory boards, and donates considerable funds," they said. "DuPont also is a substantial backer of the ACS Breast Health Awareness Program; sponsors television shows and other media productions touting ACS literature for hospitals, clinics, medical organization, and doctors; produces educational films; and aggressively lobbies Congress for legislation promoting the nationwide availability of mammography services."

The United States Preventive Service Task Force recently revised its breast cancer screening guidelines to recommend fewer mammograms, in part due to the fact that radiation from mammograms can actually increase cancer risk. According to Epstein and Bertell, a premenopausal woman could receive 5 rads of radiation exposure in 10 years from mammograms alone, equivalent to the exposure experienced by a woman standing one mile from the detonation of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Mammograms are also better at detecting non-threatening cancers that would never have required treatment than the more aggressive, lethal varieties. Yet an ACS ad published in a leading Massachussetts newspaper showed two women in their twenties (the federal government no longer recommends mammograms for most women under the age of 40) and promised that early detection cures breast cancer "nearly 100 percent of the time."

When questioned about the basis of this claim, an ACS communications director responded, "The ad isn't based on a study. When you make an advertisement, you just say what you can to get women in the door. You exaggerate a point. ... Mammography today is a lucrative [and] highly competitive business."

Based in part on the ACS's promotion of mammography, the "Chronicle of Philanthropy," concluded that the organization "is more interested in accumulating wealth than saving lives."

Sources for this story include: world-wire.com.
__________________
"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." ~Immanual Kant~
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-13-2010, 04:27 AM
saved1986's Avatar
Lecturer
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 617
My Mood: Bitchy
saved1986 is on a distinguished road
Default

ACS IS A JOKE. THEY ARE A PAID FRONT OF BIG PHARMA, SO IS THE AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION AND A BUNCH OF OTHER GROUPS. ALSO, WHEN YOU DONATE FOR CANCER RESEARCH AND MOST OTHER RESEARCH, SOME OF THAT $$ GOES TO SEND THE RESEARCHERS TO CONFERENCES IN HIGH END RESORTS.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
acs, breast, cancer, mammograms, radiation, screenings

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Rife frequency device D Bergy Alternative Therapies 19 05-21-2010 05:48 AM
Low Cost Wound Healing Device liverock General Discussion 1 04-21-2010 10:37 AM