IFRD chips

Mad Scientest · � #1 � 05-18-2009, 08:51 AM

When first introduced IFRD chips were for Fido or Fluffy to get them returned in case they wandered off and got lost, then it was IFRD chips in prisoners to help keep track of their whereabouts, then it was IFRD chips in grandma & grandpa in case they wandered off and got lost. Then if everyone were to be chipped we could have the �convenience� of cash-less society. But not many were overly concerned because government, as always, was doing this for our protection, health and security.

WELL we now have the latest version and guess what? You will only be able to go and do whatever you�re told, or else!

'Killer Chip' tracks humans, releases poison

[POLICE STATE coming to a democracy near you]

Arrowwind09 · � #2 � 05-18-2009, 11:57 AM

Yea, they say stuff like that is coming but for some reason I don't think that people will allow it...the technology has been available for a while now. Folks like Cheney will have to get a better hold on power. Right now their agendas are having a set back and a lot of people who naively supported people who are into absolute power are waking up to what has been happening.
...... let the trials commence....this is our best defense.

kind2creatures · � #3 � 05-18-2009, 02:44 PM

I've heard more than one person say that they wouldn't mind being chipped to go cashless. Not me, I wouldn't even chip my dogs...also heard they may cause cancer at the injection site.

Mad Scientest · � #4 � 05-18-2009, 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arrowwind09

Yea, they say stuff like that is coming but for some reason I don't think that people will allow it...

I would like to think so but as kind2creatures pointed out some think that this is a great idea.
I wonder what these individuals would say if they got their wish and were chipped but then offended some government official who in turn deactivated their chip rendering them a non-entity unable to buy anything?

But have all of the control agendas really been set back? Or are we just seeing some changes? BO said he was opposed to campGitmo but now he is willing to allow it to continue. He says he supports the 2nd. Amendment put has signed presidential orders that if acted on would virtually prevent someone from owning a gun.
Yet at the same time we are being told guns are bad we have the boy scouts be trained to spy on us and in the use weapons to protect us from returning solders that might want to use their training to oppose the government.
And naturally we will need a �fairness doctrine� to protect us any evil things that might be said about the government.

(Hooray the king is dead. Long live the new king. Same as the old king.)

Of course the Bilderbergers who just held the annual meeting in Greece this weekend have no problem with this type of agenda. As usual MSM coverage of their �event� was virtually non-existence, particularly in the US. A few of the reporters that were there were arrested just for walking around in the street and taking pictures. Yet it is OK for government to place cameras in the street and take picture of us. Do the majority of people care what is happing to their freedoms? Or are they so brainwashed that they cannot see what is actually going on around them?

liverock · � #5 � 05-19-2009, 04:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Scientest

I would like to think so but as kind2creatures pointed out some think that this is a great idea.
I wonder what these individuals would say if they got their wish and were chipped but then offended some government official who in turn deactivated their chip rendering them a non-entity unable to buy anything?

But have all of the control agendas really been set back? Or are we just seeing some changes? BO said he was opposed to campGitmo but now he is willing to allow it to continue. He says he supports the 2nd. Amendment put has signed presidential orders that if acted on would virtually prevent someone from owning a gun.
Yet at the same time we are being told guns are bad we have the boy scouts be trained to spy on us and in the use weapons to protect us from returning solders that might want to use their training to oppose the government.
And naturally we will need a “fairness doctrine” to protect us any evil things that might be said about the government.

(Hooray the king is dead. Long live the new king. Same as the old king.)

Of course the Bilderbergers who just held the annual meeting in Greece this weekend have no problem with this type of agenda. As usual MSM coverage of their “event” was virtually non-existence, particularly in the US. A few of the reporters that were there were arrested just for walking around in the street and taking pictures. Yet it is OK for government to place cameras in the street and take picture of us. Do the majority of people care what is happing to their freedoms? Or are they so brainwashed that they cannot see what is actually going on around them?

What should really worry people in the US is the fact that Obama met the Bilderbergers before he was elected (this is common, both Clinton and Blair met them and were grilled before they were elected).

He must have appeared sound on the need for a one world government and the surrender of the US constitution, otherwise he would not have got the press backing he did in the election. For those not aware all the main news media CEO's are Bilderberger members.

Despite this he swore to defend and uphold the constitution in his inauguration.

Arrowwind09 · � #6 � 05-19-2009, 09:06 AM

I must maintain faith that we will not surrender our power and our dignity as a human species .... I think that we are in for a very different future outside of fear and oppression, although I do recognize the forces that must be contended with.

The change that we need is within our consciousness and if we allow fear to take us then they have won.

liverock · � #7 � 05-21-2009, 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Scientest

I would like to think so but as kind2creatures pointed out some think that this is a great idea.
I wonder what these individuals would say if they got their wish and were chipped but then offended some government official who in turn deactivated their chip rendering them a non-entity unable to buy anything?

But have all of the control agendas really been set back? Or are we just seeing some changes? BO said he was opposed to campGitmo but now he is willing to allow it to continue. He says he supports the 2nd. Amendment put has signed presidential orders that if acted on would virtually prevent someone from owning a gun.
Yet at the same time we are being told guns are bad we have the boy scouts be trained to spy on us and in the use weapons to protect us from returning solders that might want to use their training to oppose the government.
And naturally we will need a “fairness doctrine” to protect us any evil things that might be said about the government.

(Hooray the king is dead. Long live the new king. Same as the old king.)

Of course the Bilderbergers who just held the annual meeting in Greece this weekend have no problem with this type of agenda. As usual MSM coverage of their “event” was virtually non-existence, particularly in the US. A few of the reporters that were there were arrested just for walking around in the street and taking pictures. Yet it is OK for government to place cameras in the street and take picture of us. Do the majority of people care what is happing to their freedoms? Or are they so brainwashed that they cannot see what is actually going on around them?

Heres the experience of one UK tabloid journalist who attempted to find out what was happening at the recent meeting of the Bilderbergers in Greece.

Our man at Bilderberg: Let's salt the slug in 2010 | News | guardian.co.uk

��Useful Links

Site Navigation