I recently read a book called the �One Minute cure�. I�m curious about what you think about the author�s method. He starts out and spent a lot of time by telling us that the conventional medicinal establishment is more concerned about making money then curing their patients. On that point I think that most here would agree that he is preaching to the choir.

He then goes on and states that a person does not get sick because they were attacked by some �germ or bug�. He uses the example of if you have a bunch of mosquitoes at a pond of stagnant water, did the mosquitoes make the water stagnant or were they attracted to it? Thus if you come down with a disease it is because the �disease�, like the mosquitoes, simply found an environment in which it was able to thrive and grow.

He also makes the point that there have been many studies that show many diseases need an oxygen poor environment to thrive. Conversely it has been shown that if a person is treated with some oxygen enhancement procedure, such as ozone, this will rejuvenate the body�s immune system so it is now better able to fight off the infection.

He illustrates the importance of the bodies need for an adequate supply of oxygen with this example. A person can go without food for 2-3 weeks, without water 2-3 days, but without oxygen you will die within minutes. Of these three items needed to sustain life an adequate supply of oxygen is the most essential. Thus he surmises that maintaining the correct oxygen level is absolutely critical to maintaining good health and even slight changes in oxygen levels can produce an environment where disease can survive and grow. Again he sights studies showing that when healthy cells were placed in an environment with just slightly lower oxygen levels within a few days they frequently become cancerous.

For 170 years various oxygen treatments have been used and have demonstrated their ability to strengthen the immune system thus allowing it to cure the disease. However many of these techniques require special equipment and training to use. Plus many conventional doctors are unaware of this critical role that oxygen plays in promoting good health or they choose to ignore it. His solution to avoid these problems is to use Hydrogen peroxide!

He claims that by drinking food grade hydrogen peroxide diluted to 3 -24 drops per 6-8 ounce of water this will insure that the immune system has enough oxygen to function correctly. This is something one can administer themselves without any special training and it is shown to give the same results as a professionally administered oxygen or ozone treatments.

However you are cautioned to use only the 35% food grade hydrogen peroxide as it does not contain any additional chemicals. The hydrogen peroxide is safe if used in the recommended doses of course you must never try trying it undulated. At 35% it is way too caustic.

He has a whole protocol for its use worked out. For a serious infection start with a dose of 3 drops 3 times a day and slowly working up to 25 by adding an extra drop per day. Then reduce by a drop per day until your back down to 3 drops per day. Three drops a day is considered the maintenance level. Some may need to stay at the 25 drop level for a longer period of time depending on their condition. Also it should be taken on and empty stomach.

I found it interesting and in some ways this sounds similar to MMS. Has anyone here tried this? Or know any more about it?

Too bad that you had to buy a book for that. In 2003, Dr. David Williams had a great report on this protocol. Look down the page for the suggested daily protocol. Sounds simple for all the supposed benefits.

https://www.educate-yourself.org/canc...e17jul03.shtml

I'm mixed on the Germ Theory. I've posted my acknowledgment about it here before. I'm not completely convinced on the theory; but theories evolve and so does my mind. If the theory were correct, one would believe that it is the environment that causes the problem. Candida thrives in living healthy tissue. How about e-coli and salmonella? They are introduced to a healthy body; and can overwhelm a strong immune system.

I've been meaning to start this h2o2 protocol. I have a quart of 35%. I just can't remember to do it. I tried MMS for 9 months; and I am not impressed. Both chemicals have to get to the microbe to affect the situation. Neither last very long before they break down.

I believe there are anaerobic and aerobic bacteria - good and bad.

Still, it is worth the experiment.

__________________
.
- Jim

�Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened.� Sir Winston Churchill

Of all the research concerning oxygen as treatment, the best I've seen is ozone, hands down.

Ozone, given by I.V., can knock out pretty much any virus, including Hep B and C, as well as all herpes, even the very difficult Herpes 6.

Oxone will also knock out most cancers, however, you'd have to travel to another country for this treatment since it is not recognized in North America.

I agree PBD. I would go to another country for the ozone service, if I am ever in such a health crisis. Also, did you know you can knock out foot fungus, if you bag your foot and feed ozone into the bag via an ozone generator; even a cheap one.

a cheap enlay ozonator can knock out tinnitis and ear fungus also.

__________________

Here's the attachment for William's H2O2 Medical Miracle. Maybe you can take it from here.

Attached Files

H202MedicalMiracle.pdf (851.6 KB, 116 views)

The germ theory has validity also. Not all pathogens can be destroyed no matter how healthy or oxygenated you are.

Oxidization treatments do resolve a lot of problems, but you can't oversimplify to the point of saying the Oxygenated terrain of the body will prevent or resolve all illness. Cancer is not always anaerobic. It has forms that can survive in an oxygen rich environment. If it couldn't, most any Oxidizing treatment would have nearly a 100% cure rate.

Dan

Ok I�ve had a chance to read Douglass�s report he and the author of the book I read are in virtual agreement. H2O2 will cure, actually allow the immune system to cure, many but not all diseases. Where they differ is in how to administer it. Douglass prefers the use of an IV. This author prefers oral. In his book which is about five years newer then Douglass�s he claims that the latest research shows both IV and oral have essentially the same cure rate.

Ive been up all night reading this book. Thank you for the link. It is so informative . Id like to go back and read it some more. What is this about lead in h202? Thats the first ive heard of it. I am using the 3 % in all kinds of ways. Using it in nontoxic house cleaning. Really great in bathrooms and kitchen. Floors too.

No, it will not. This is utter nonsense.

Ozone can knock out some cancers. Its application often requires the assistence of a medical doctor to do various types of injection work. sometimes the ozone must be injected directly into the tumor. Other times it needs to be injected directly into the blood. In certain parts of the world they have a machine similar to a dialysis machine that ozonates the blood then pulls the resulting toxins out at the same time.. this has been known to cure some cancers also... but especially good for cardiovascular issues... really for a lot of issues.

It will not cure all cancer but it may cure some if correctly applied.

I just got suckered into purchasing this one minute cure book this week. I should have looked here on the forum first... got it used on amazon for cheap. Seems a promotion of the book is going on right now via email.

If I knew it was hydrogen peroxide I would have saved my money..

I really disagree with the idea that H2O2 helps by providing oxygen. H202 is an oxidizer and it will destroy pathogens which means it will attack pathogens with a specific valance in its chemical composition and tear them apart, which really is most all pathogens. Your body even makes some of its own H202 for the purpose within immune pathways. It can do what oxygen in and of itself cannot do.

I'm sorry but these claims are all unproven at best and dangerous at worst. I suggest anyone believing or considering this listen to what the American Cancer Society has to say:

https://www.cancer.org/Treatment/Trea...oxygen-therapy

"Ozone/oxygen therapy" has by NO means been proven to cure ANY cancer. There is sketchy data - at best - indicating it MIGHT have some potential.

Yes that is true, it is sketchy. But why is this true? Could it have something to do with the fact that America Cancer Society will not test these procedures? Are they that confident or their minds so closed to different ideas that they will not even consider these? It is said that these different protocols don�t work, even though there are many personal stories of them doing just that. But of course we are not to trust them. We are told to only to believe those �official surveys� (stories) that were done at great expense by those institutions that want us to buy only their product.

Now the fact that the ACS standard treatments can cost hundreds if not thousands for a single treatment compared to literally penny�s for some of the alternative treatments that wouldn�t have anything to do with their reluctance to test these procedures. Would it? Of course not that is why there is currently a push to ban all natural supplements. We certainly don�t what people to think that they could improve their health by simply eating the right food or taking some natural supplement when they should be taking a very expensive pill with a long list on undesirable side effects instead.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Scientest Yes that is true, it is sketchy. But why is this true? Could it have something to do with the fact that America Cancer Society will not test these procedures?

Or maybe it has something to do with the fact that the ACS doesn't itself test such things. They do provide funding for many others to do so, however. As for them funding testing of the procedures above, I don't know. Do you?

Data being sketchy could be for all kinds of reasons and none of them sinister FYI.

Quote:

Are they that confident or their minds so closed to different ideas that they will not even consider these?

Yes, that must be it.

Quote:

It is said that these different protocols don’t work, even though there are many personal stories of them doing just that. But of course we are not to trust them.

You're kidding I hope-? You seriously don't get why we shouldn't trust personal stories? Maybe because that's all they are: stories, ie nothing that can be proven either way. Anyone can make a claim. That is hardly evidence, let alone proof.

Quote:

We are told to only to believe those “official surveys” (stories) that were done at great expense by those institutions that want us to buy only their product.

The ACS does not sell any products FYI, so that makes no sense. Not sure where you're going with the "official surveys" thing (whatever that means) but perhaps more weight is given to them because they are regulated, verified, etc etc. It's not like one guy going "hey I talked to Fred and he said he cured his cancer by standing on his head 3 times a day" or a bunch of similar quotes thrown on a web page where supposedly someone had this or that happen.

Quote:

Now the fact that the ACS standard treatments

?? Far as I know there is no such thing as an "ACS standard treatment." What is that supposed to mean?

Quote:

can cost hundreds if not thousands for a single treatment compared to literally penny’s for some of the alternative treatments that wouldn’t have anything to do with their reluctance to test these procedures. Would it? Of course not

Well I'm glad we cleared that up. PS and oh btw, perhaps some of the alternative treatments being cheaper might have to do with the fact that those pimping them know that one of the big appeals to alternative treatments is being cheap. Also they are often extremely cheap and easy for them to make (the "miracle mineral water," for example). And some alternative treatments are quite expensive. Also it's not hard to see why methods like surgery, etc are expensive if you think about it.....many (many) highly trained people involved, cost of anathesia, hospital stays, equipment, on and on.

Quote:

that is why there is currently a push to ban all natural supplements.

I'd love to hear where you got that from.

Quote:

We certainly don’t what people to think that they could improve their health by simply eating the right food or taking some natural supplement when they should be taking a very expensive pill with a long list on undesirable side effects instead.

Well I'm sorry to hear that's your attitude, but it's not the ACS's, FYI. Yes, the ACS, which some of you seem to think is some kind of evil organization that hates all things "natural" and wants you to take expensive dangerous pills, which is so ridiculous it's bizarre. I can't help but wonder where some of you get these ideas.

Don't think so? Here's a quote from their "About Us" page:

Let's see...eat healthy, quite smoking.....amazingly, I didn't see anything in there about "disregard natural stuff and take lots of expensive pills."

It truly amazes me that some of you can type some of this stuff with a straight face and really mean it.

The american cancer society has no credit on this forum.