Since Xania posted the article about radioactive iodine, the increase in lung cancer as reported by Dr Howenstine I became quite curoius about this doc. He also wrote an informative article about the very inexpensive use of iodine to treat a number of conditons. Below is another article he wrote on Gulf War Syndrome. Again there is the reference to cancer in Iraqi children. I can not help but wonder that this is revealed because children in Iraq hospitals are tracked better than adults. There may be other reasons why children are more susceptible.
I read several articles on depleated uranium bombs and their use in the US military. What they are actually saying is that the US government has never really stopped using nuclear war. They have only shapeshifted. This is a disturbing article and I found similar information on depeated uranium on the net.
Depleted Uranium, Anthrax Vaccine & The Gulf War Syndrome, Part 1
Dr. James Howenstine, MD. | August 8 2005
More and more veterans have become chronically ill from a multitude of symptoms since the end of Gulf War I. For many years the U.S. government denied any responsibility for their mysterious symptoms. Only 7,035 men were injured in this war. A total of 580,400 soldiers served in the first Gulf War. By the end of 2000 325,000 of these troops had become disabled This means that 56 % of those who served in the first Gulf War were disabled within less than 10 years.
In August 2004 American Free Press reported that eight out of twenty men serving in one unit during the 2003 invasion of Iraq had developed malignancies. This translates into 40 % of the soldiers in that one unit developing malignancies within a 16 month period of time. What is causing these terrible health problems?
Nine members of the National Guard from New York State recently returned from Iraq. These persons were deployed as Military Police. Two manmade forms of uranium were found in urine specimens from 4 of these 9 soldiers. Certainly soldiers in combat roles would be expected to have even greater exposure to inhaling depleted uranium dust.
Since 1943 the military has been aware of the extreme toxicity of uranium as a gas. A Oct 30, 1943 memo from Manhattan Project physicist James B. Conant to Brig. General L.B. Abrams stated that as a gas warfare instrument the radioactive material would be ground into microscopic particles forming dust and smoke and could be distributed by ground fired projectiles, land vehicles or aerial bombs. In this form it would be inhaled by personnel. They estimated that one millionth of a gram would be fatal. There are no known methods of treatment for such casualties.
The depleted uranium DU was also recommended as a permanent terrain contaminant which could be used to destroy populations by contaminating water supplies and agricultural land with radioactive dust. Current estimates suggest that the damaged soil in Iraq, Yugoslavia and Afghanistan will need four and a half billion years to recover from the radioactive effect of DU.
Some of the uranium from shells vaporizes into particles measuring 1/10 of a micron. These particles enter the atmosphere and later fall to the ground with rain. Radioactive debris has been found at both the North and South Poles. In gaseous form the chemically toxic and radioactive uranium easily enters the body through the skin or when inhaled into the lungs. Clothing and gas masks are easily penetrated. Large missiles and bombs can disperse nearly 100 % of the DU into the atmosphere whereas only 30 % of a tank shell disperses when fired. Any soldier or civilian who breathes this gas has a permanent dose of radioactive uranium RAU.
Uranium is quite dense so it is ideal for penetrating armor. The radioactive uranium is shaped into a penetrating rod 18 inches long and � inch in diameter. When these shells are fired some of the uranium contacts air and explodes into flame (pyrophoric quality).
Scientists studying the biologic effects of radiation in the 1960s reported that radioactive uranium targets the DNA. Marion Fulk, a nuclear physical chemist, who had worked for both the Manhattan project and the Livermore Nuclear Weapon Lab interprets the new and rapid development of malignancies in soldiers from the 2003 war as �spectacular and a matter of concern.� She states �This is the perfect weapon (DU) for killing lots of people.�
There are three effects of depleted uranium on biologic systems �radiation, chemical and particulate. The particulate effect of nano-sized particles is the most important of these three. This appears immediately after exposure and targets the master code of DNA. Simply stated depleted uranium �trashes the body.� The DNA damage is so severe these patients develop multiple simultaneous cancers from different causes. This new syndrome has never been reported before and is unique to internal depleted uranium exposure. Such patients were seen in civilians in Yugoslavia after NATO bombing using DU bombs. There is currently an epidemic of cancer in Iraqi children.
Another horrifying consequence of DU exposure is damage to sperm causing many severe deformities in the children born to veterans of the first Gulf War. A group of 251 soldiers from Mississippi, who all had normal babies before service in Iraq, were studied. Sixty seven percent of their post war babies were born with severe birth defects. These children were missing legs, arms, organs or eyes and had immune system and blood diseases. In some Gulf War veterans families the only normal children are those who were born before serving in Iraq. The Department of Defense denies any knowledge of birth defects in Gulf War I veterans.
How Much Depleted Uranium Has Been Used?
Depleted uranium weapons were developed by the U.S. Navy in 1968. Depleted uranium weapons were given to and used by Israel with U.S. supervision in the Yom Kippur War in 1973 against the Arabs nations. Military research detailed the use of DU weapons at military testing grounds, bombing and gunnery ranges and civilian labs under contracts between 1974-1999. Presently 42 states have contamination from the manufacture, testing and deployment of depleted uranium. The United States has sold DU weapons to 29 countries.
In Gulf War I DU weapons were used against Iraq. Between 315 and 350 tons of depleted uranium was used in that war. The current Iraq war has expended an estimated 5 times more tonnage of DU than was used in the first Gulf War.
Japanese professor, Dr. K. Yagasaki, has calculated that 800 tons of depleted uranium is the atomicity equivalent of 83,000 bombs the size of the one which struck Nagasaki. The U.S. has used more depleted uranium since 1991 than the atomicity equivalent of 400,000 Nagasaki bombs. This includes four nuclear wars (Iraq twice, Yugoslavia and Afghanistan) and is 10 times the amount of radiation released into the air from atmospheric testing. Experts from the Department of Defense say that the U.S. has 100 million tons of DU. Using up the DU in wars afford a convenient way to dispose of some of the radioactive uranium and thus avoid some of the huge expense that careful disposing of tons of DU would entail.
The �clean up� of 34 Abrams tanks and Bradley armored vehicles that were erroneously hit by U.S. missiles during this first Gulf war was supervised by Dr. Doug Rokke. Today he is suffering ill effects from DU that entered his body in the clean up. One of the problems he has is brittle teeth. The uranium displaces calcium in both teeth and bones resulting in teeth that break. The majority of U.S. casualties in this war were from �friendly fire.� Dr. Rokke relates that DU is used because it is the most effective weapon at killing and destroying everything it hits.
Thousands of tons of depleted uranium were used for decades at four bombing and gunnery ranges in Fallon, Nevada. This usage is no doubt responsible for the fastest growing leukemia cluster in the U.S. The military has denied that DU has anything to do with this cluster. The medical profession has been involved in the cover-up�just as they were hiding the adverse effects that low level radiation from atmospheric testing and nuclear power plants were producing.
A physician in Northern California was being trained in the Pentagon with other physicians months before the 2003 Gulf War started. They were told to diagnose and treat soldiers returning from the 2003 war for mental problems only. Medical professionals in hospitals and facilities treating returning soldiers were threatened with $10,000 fines if they talked about the soldiers or their medical problems. They were also threatened with jail[1] terms.
Senator Paul Wellstone informed Joyce Riley R.N., executive director of the American Gulf War Veterans Association, that 95 % of Gulf War I veterans had been recycled out of the military by 1995. Any of those continuing in military service were carefully isolated from each other, preventing critical information from being shared with new troops. One has to wonder if his airplane crash was really an accident.
My initial reaction to the 1993 Gulf War was that it was all about oil which we desperately needed. Now it appears that I was wrong. Currently there is strong evidence that we are preparing to invade Iran. Whether this invasion will be preceded by another �terrorist� attack on the U.S. is obviously unknown. Perhaps a nuclear attack on a U.S. city by �Arabs� would attract sufficient public opinion approval to warrant another U.S. invasion of a sovereign nation.
My impression currently is that there may be a more insidious and sinister aspect to the invasion of Iraq. Could we be using this nuclear war as a way to lower the population of an Arab nation? Exposing all the citizens in a nation to a daily dose of radioactive uranium dust would be certain to produce very premature deaths and inability to reproduce. These irradiated nations will have huge problems with illness of their citizens and the inability of most parents to produce healthy children for succeeding generations.
Who is going to be willing to work in irradiated oil fields knowing that their life expectancy will be reduced by many years and that there is a strong possibility that they will probably never be able to have normal children. Even salaries of a million dollars annually do not sound very attractive to me to work in those irradiation contaminated oil fields.
The new book The High Priests of War documents how Henry Kissinger had planned an attack against the Arab world in the late 1960s and early 1970s. This nicely coincided with a Middle Eastern oil crisis and the development of DU war capabilities.
Mr. Kissinger had been previously involved in plans (later implemented) to lower the population of blacks in Africa by using bio-warfare[2] programs (vaccines contaminated with HIV virus). This CIA plot was code named PROJECT MKNAOMI. The details about the development of the HIV vaccine in the NIH Cancer Division are well documented in Leonard G. Horowtz�s book Emerging Viruses AIDS and Ebola Nature, Accident or Intentional?
When David J. Smith asked Vietnam Special Ops Green Beret Captain John McCarthy �who could have devised this omnicidal plan to use depleted uranium to destroy the genetic code and genetic future of large populations of Arabs and Moslems in the Middle East and Central Asia where most of the world�s oil deposits are located?� he replied �It has all the handprints of Henry Kissinger.�
I agree about the way UK & US are using DU it is something that is never brought up in the news and the average citizen has no idea what we are doing. This was one of my main arguments about going to Iraq I felt that we were killing untold numbers of people and not just for the war but for unforseen years to come. It still makes my blood boil when I hear we are still out there and the damage we are doing with the winds carrying it all over. I don't think we need to think about an attack on Iran - we have proberbly already done it.
On another post it was alluded to that Dr Howenstine may be of questionable motive either politically or for profits.
I have been reading his articles and have found them of great interest. I have not seen exorbitant lures to purchase products although he does have a webpage to sell a modest line of what appears to be very good products to me. Other doctors I respect like Donsbach and Schlutze sell products also.
What I am trying to determine is if this is a reality about depleted uranium bombs. His article prompted me to search the net and a I found a wealth of alarming articles about the danger of these weapons to the environment and to the people of the world.
Now Dr Howenstine says that the increase of lung cancer may be related to the use of these weapons. I have been yelling that most lung cancer cases I see are not cigarette related.. If not cigarettes than what! Most of the patients I see are very sweet elderly Mormons that lead fairly riskless lives, supposedly. Yet lung cancer abounds! And I am finding within many socioeconomic groups. Yet no one is saying anything. Not the media, not medicine. This has been plaguing my brain for 2 years now. They just keep coming, one lung cancer after another.
So I am trying to find out about Dr Howenstine and what his motives are, why he might print such an article. If it is not true information than so be it but if it is true I dam well want to know about it and so should the rest of the citizens of the world!
Either people here think that this a potentially important enough issue to look into it or they don't. Either way I will endeavor to get to the bottom of it.
In trying to find some answers, I came up with links to sites which claim an increased incidence of lung cancer around the world. There was no mention of DU in any of them so far. Here they are.
I expect there are many more, but you get the idea. Lung cancer rates are rising all around the world.
There is no doubt that only 25% of the UK population smokes now. When I was a child, absolutely everyone did. Non-smokers were such a rarity and thought of as freaks and cranks, like vegetarians!!
In my view, when P.T.Barnums said "There is one born every minute", he made a gigantic understatement. In addition to the suckers, there are millions today, it would seem, who are firm proponents of chicken little.
Esteemed discussion partners: I don't buy it. Of course I go along with the idea that ionizing radiation is very damaging. But that is high-frequency radiation. I find it hard to believe, though, that electromagnatic radiation in the telecommunications range will harm us.
We are chemical beings. Even neural pulses, so essential for muscle action, do not consist of continuous electrical signals. Neurons are not all that long. When they have to transfer a signal to the next neuron in line, a chemical neural transmitter diffuses across the synapse (space between two neurons) to send the impulse further on its way. For this reason, I don't give the development of human robots (about which there has been a lot of speculation) much of a chance. Such electrical beings will never be viable, because of the omnipresent electromagnetic radiation.
We, chemical beings, won't be harmed by our cell phones.
But don't take my word for it. Do the experiment yourself! Yes, I mean you, and you, and you:
Put a number of small animals (fruit flies, cockroaches, mice, or rats) in a closed terrarium. Make sure there is enough air circulation, water and whatever these beasts eat, to keep them alive. Then take a second group of the same test animals and house them under exactly the same conditions. But include a cell phone with this group. Then make a call to this phone from time to time, and as the animals start to die of old age, eventually, see if there are significantly more deaths in the box containing the cell phone than in the control box. If there are, you have proved your point.
Dr Howenstine. Lets figure him out.
Linear Mode
