I've been reading over at the rife forum, and corrected my notation of the current RIFE machines which evidently are not the same as the Royal Rife machine.
anyway.. the guy that produced that video posted about his video in more detail on the rifeforum here:
Because of these experiments, I was invited to present my research at the Bioelectromagnetics (BEMS) 30th annual Convention in San Diego, California, this past June (200. The abstract of my presentation was approved by the BEMS technical committee and published in the proceedings. I am uploading the final proof of that document as part of this entry I'm writing now. I also co-authored a paper which was presented in Palermo, Italy this Autumn by physicist Dr. Gerard Dubost, who has attempted to explain some of the physics behind the results in my experiments. There were four authors of that paper and it was accepted at a scientific conference in Europe. Research is ongoing with other scientists in various collaborations I am currently engaged in with continued experiments with the RB device. I assure you, the biological effects you see in my videos are unusual and quite real.
P-78 MORPHOLOGICAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE PROTOZOA
BLEPHARISMA BY FREQUENCY SPECIFIC AMPLITUDE MODULATED RF
PULSED PLASMAS
Anthony G. Holland. Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY, USA.
Summary of Abstract. The protozoa Blepharisma can undergo dramatic and disruptive morphological transformations caused by frequency specic, low power, pulsed, amplitude modulated radio frequency (RF) elds utilizing an enclosed gas plasma antenna.
Objectives. Proof-of-concept experiments demonstrating that frequency specific, low power, pulsed, amplitude modulated (AM) radio frequency (RF) fields utilizing an enclosed gas plasma antenna, can have dramatic disruptive effects on some biological organisms.
Specific harmonic and dissonant tonal relationships between input frequencies in AM RF
pulses are explored and correlations are drawn between these relationships and the level of biological effects. The biological effects are photographed and video taped.
... Conclusions. The protozoa Blepharisma can undergo dramatic and disruptive morphological transformations caused by frequency specific, low power, pulsed, amplitude modulated
radio frequency (RF) fields utilizing an enclosed gas plasma antenna. Five different types of
changes in organisms have been documented. Biological effects seem to be most pronounced
when two or three simultaneous and harmonically related square wave frequencies are used
as input controls for the AM with the index of modulation exceeding 1 within the RF
transmitter, resulting in a pulsed RF output which contains a wideband spectrum reaching
as high as 150Mhz. Spectrum analysis shows that harmonically related audio range square
waves can create a greater spectral energy density at specific locations in the frequency
domain, serving to group sidebands into focused areas of greater spectral intensity and this
correlates with the biological effects documented. Waveform analysis reveals that a correlation
may exist between the biological effects, the number of RF pulses per second and the
shape of pulse amplitude envelopes.
Donee and MadScientist, I thought you might be interested ... They also have some other abstracts on the effects of different energy cells, health.
Just noticed this the other day. Long article took a while to read. However I found it interesting; the author has obviously done his homework and taken the time to do some serious research. It would appear that Rife machines do work, but not just any old Rife machine. But it needs to do one of the early designs that used RF frequencies (radio waves) and these waves were then rapidly pulsed (turned on&off). The problem with using one of those old machines today is without adequate shielding they would disrupt normal radio reception. In the 50�s the machines were redesigned to limit radio interference but unfortunately this also limited the Rife machines effectiveness.
It is pulsed RF frequencies that are responsible for the killing of the �bad bugs� however one has to first find the exact frequency that the particular �bug� you are trying to kill doesn�t like. Rife spent many hours doing this, trying different frequencies until he found the ones that worked. Regrettably his frequency measurements where not that accurate, thus when others used his numbers they found that they might or might not work.
Having a machine that would sweep through all the frequencies might be a way to get around that problem. But would a bad bug be killed by being only briefly exposed to a frequency that it did not like or would just find it slightly annoying?
This would sort of be like a blind man trying to put out a fire in a waste basket by randomly spraying the whole room with a fire hose with the hope the some of the water will hit the fire and thus put it out.
Just noticed this the other day. Long article took a while to read. However I found it interesting; the author has obviously done his homework and taken the time to do some serious research. It would appear that Rife machines do work, but not just any old Rife machine. But it needs to do one of the early designs that used RF frequencies (radio waves) and these waves were then rapidly pulsed (turned on&off). The problem with using one of those old machines today is without adequate shielding they would disrupt normal radio reception. In the 50’s the machines were redesigned to limit radio interference but unfortunately this also limited the Rife machines effectiveness.
The limitation on frequencies because of FCC regulations only pertain to the plasma tube rife machines, from what I understand. Arrowwind told me that part of the reason she purchased the GB4000 in the past was because it had the original Rife frequencies.. and the GB4000 is a "pad" contact device.
They've found some documents just this year that cleared some questions up about the original Rife machines..
The Rife forum is interesting.. they've got quite a few electronics enthusiasts and some electrical engineers. Some interesting conversations.. even if I don't understand a lot of it. It is also interesting to have such a left brained "alternative" forum.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Scientest
It is pulsed RF frequencies that are responsible for the killing of the “bad bugs” however one has to first find the exact frequency that the particular “bug” you are trying to kill doesn’t like. Rife spent many hours doing this, trying different frequencies until he found the ones that worked. Regrettably his frequency measurements where not that accurate, thus when others used his numbers they found that they might or might not work.
Having a machine that would sweep through all the frequencies might be a way to get around that problem. But would a bad bug be killed by being only briefly exposed to a frequency that it did not like or would just find it slightly annoying?
This would sort of be like a blind man trying to put out a fire in a waste basket by randomly spraying the whole room with a fire hose with the hope the some of the water will hit the fire and thus put it out.
you run the frequency for a while. and different machines do different things.. the GB4000 can run 8 frequencies at once, and it does have a "sweep" function.
Mad Scientest, here is a paper on the Rife Frequencies.. however the date is 2005.. previous to the latest paper on the history (in my 2nd post in this thread):
Obviously getting the �rife� frequency is critical if this device is to work. Staring into a microscope looking for some microbe to die is a very slow tedious process plus one has to accurately measure and record that frequency. What is needed is some quick way to determine if a given frequency is having an effect. But I don�t know what that might be.
The only thing that comes to mind is modulating the carrier with what is called �white noise� (a bunch of random frequencies) with the hope that one of them is the one you want. But then if all of these frequencies are occurring at once would that reduce the effectiveness?
Obviously getting the �rife� frequency is critical if this device is to work. Staring into a microscope looking for some microbe to die is a very slow tedious process plus one has to accurately measure and record that frequency. What is needed is some quick way to determine if a given frequency is having an effect. But I don�t know what that might be.
The only thing that comes to mind is modulating the carrier with what is called �white noise� (a bunch of random frequencies) with the hope that one of them is the one you want. But then if all of these frequencies are occurring at once would that reduce the effectiveness?
Questions, questions, but no answers.
Char Boehm has come up with a method based on the genome length of the microbe: DNA Pathogen Frequencies
R.I.F.E. Machine.. in action 2
Linear Mode
