An Uphill Battle Against Hospital Infection
Betsy McCaughey

On April 16, the House Committee on Government Oversight and Reform held a hearing on the federal government's inadequate response to hospital infections.

One witness was Bill Lawton, a retired Air Force policeman who went into a New York hospital for orthopedic surgery. There he contracted several bacterial infections that landed him in a wheelchair for life.

He described the excruciating pain he endured during three subsequent surgeries to remove infected tissue from his back and the "unconscionable" violations of hygiene he witnessed.

While bedridden, he was rolled from side to side each morning as his sheets were changed. The hospital staff allowed the new sheet to drag on the floor below the bed, and then they stretched it over the mattress, and rolled him back so his open wound rested directly on the contaminated sheet.

How many patients contract hospital infections? Amazingly, the federal government doesn't know. At the hearing, a spokesperson for the Government Accountability Office chastised the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other federal agencies for not having adequate data.

The CDC speculates that 1.7 million patients get hospital infections each year, but CDC spokesperson Nicole Coffin admits "the number isn't perfect." In fact, the truth is several times that number.

One of the fastest growing infections is MRSA, or "Mersa," which stands for methicillin-resistant Staphlococcus aureus, a superbug that doesn't respond to most antibiotics.

In 1993, there were fewer than 2,000 MRSA infections in U.S. hospitals. By 2007, 2.4% of all hospital patients were contracting MRSA hospital infections, according to the largest ever survey of U.S. hospitals, published in the American Journal of Infection Control. That means at least 880,000 victims a year.

That's from one superbug. MRSA accounts for only 8% of all hospital infections, according to a nationwide study released April 6 by Emory University researchers. Clearly, hospital infections affect more than 1.7 million people a year.

Failing to level with the public about the size of the infection problem is only one of the CDC's shortcomings. Their lax guidelines give many hospitals an excuse to do too little to correct the problem.

For example, the CDC is stalling recommending that all hospitals test incoming patients for MRSA. It's a simple skin or nasal swab. Evanston Northwestern Healthcare System near Chicago reduced MRSA infections 70% over two years by using screening, according to a study in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

"If it works in these three different hospitals, it will work anywhere," said Dr. Lance Peterson, the study's lead author. Evanston Northwestern's achievement is especially notable because the hospitals already had below average infection rates.

Why is screening effective? Patients who unknowingly carrying MRSA bacteria on their body shed it on wheel chairs, blood pressure cuffs and virtually every other surface. Patients don't realize they have the germ, because it doesn't make them sick until it gets inside their bodies, usually via a surgical incision, catheter or ventilator.

With screening, hospitals can identify the MRSA positive patients, isolate them, use separate equipment and insist on gowns and gloves when treating them. Patients carrying the germ on their skin are as contagious as patients who are already infected with it, according to findings announced April 7 by researchers from Case Western Reserve Medical Center and the Cleveland VA Medical Center. Most hospitals take the tip-of-the-iceberg approach, isolating infected patients only.

Is screening expensive? Not as costly as treating infections, concluded a 2006 review of screening programs published in Lancet.

Despite this evidence, only 30% of hospitals in the U.S. are screening. Progress is slow without pressure from the CDC. It's the same old story - government administrators going soft on the industry they are supposed to oversee. Congress and seven state legislatures are considering making screening mandatory. Transparency and the threat of litigation will help accomplish what the CDC is failing to do.

Twenty-two states have enacted laws requiring hospitals to report infection rates to the state for publication, and more states are likely to follow. That will force hospitals to improve.

So will impending lawsuits. Until recently, infection was considered an inevitable risk of hospitalization. Now compelling evidence that nearly all hospital infections are preventable puts physicians, hospitals and hospital board members in a new legal situation.

In 2004, Tenet Healthcare agreed to pay $31 million to settle 106 individual lawsuits on behalf of patients who suffered infections after surgery at Palm Beach Garden Medical Center in Florida. Since then, lawsuits have been filed against numerous hospitals by patients who contracted infections. Hospitals that do not screen for MRSA should take note, no matter how long the CDC delays.

As Bill Lawton, the Air Force policeman, told the committee, the CDC's Web site on preventing health care super bugs hasn't been updated since September 2005. "What has the CDC been doing for the past three years?" he asked.

Betsy McCaughey is chairman of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths and an adjunct senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. She also is a former lieutenant governor of New York State.

Contact: 212-369-3329 (office), 212-534-3047 (home), 917-748-0227(cell)

[email protected]

__________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WA1nw...eature=related I'd Rather Go Blind
This is not medical advice. Just opinion. Whatever you decide to do your your health is strictly your business and your choice.
Visit www.HealthSalon.org

There's been a massive undertaking here to clean up some places, especially after pictures of portable commodes, with visable dirty marks on them, unclean floors, ceiling mould, unsterile equipment etc etc in some hospitals were revealed.

It's just basic lack of attention, that probably accounts for a slew of hospital related infections, but nobody does anything until some regulatory body starts imposing fines and kicking the right royal arse, out of people who don't allow standards to remain acceptable.

It reminds you that with some hospitals, an out of sight out of mind scenario is created, to protect patients emotional health, regardless of their physical health.

Nice post

Dirty Ambulances May Spread Superbugs

by David Gutierrez

A British health care union has warned that inconsistent ambulance cleaning standards may be leading to the spread of disease in various parts of the United Kingdom.

An investigation by Unison concluded that the lack of mandatory standards, combined with shortages of time and money, have led many ambulance companies to adopt unsanitary ambulance cleaning policies.

"In many trusts, ambulance crews are responsible for cleaning their own vehicles and this is a waste of their time and training," said Unison leader Sam Oestreicher. "They should be out there saving lives, not mopping out the back of a dirty ambulance."

In the worst example, ambulances in the United Kingdom's North West have no dedicated cleaning staff, and the ambulance crew is not allotted any time to clean the vehicles themselves. The only case in which an ambulance will be cleaned is if it has carried a patient who is known to be infected. In these cases, the ambulance is merely mopped out.

The best procedure was that of the London Ambulance Service, which has full-time cleaners who deep clean each ambulance when it is brought in and restocked it with medical supplies.

Health Minister Ben Bradshaw replied to Unison's report by saying that there is no evidence implicating dirty ambulances as a source of infection. "The Ambulance Service Association has issued guidance and we expect trusts to follow this," he said.

But Oestreicher says that the voluntary rules must become mandatory, and that they must be matched by increased funding to enable trusts to carry them out.

While ambulance trusts in Wales and the South West have made plans to adopt systems similar to London's, they have been delayed by funding shortages.

"The government recently announced extra money for deep cleaning hospitals, but ambulances seem to have been forgotten," Oestreicher said. "They are part of the patient care package and no one should have to travel or work in a dirty ambulance."

https://www.naturalnews.com/z023257.html

__________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WA1nw...eature=related I'd Rather Go Blind
This is not medical advice. Just opinion. Whatever you decide to do your your health is strictly your business and your choice.
Visit www.HealthSalon.org

Go figure. Bradshaw is a Brown Cronie and part of a screwed up Government. He's not going to be forthcoming with a slew of failings.

Facts can't lie though. If an Ambulance is not given routine deep cleaning procedures, no assigned staff, and not even Ambulance drivers cleaning it, you are going to get infections in them, even off a Paramedics boot in all likelihood.

I'm glad this kind of thing is being highlighted, even if some sectors of the political and media community, are trying to keep it hush hush.

Another case of out of sight out of mind.