\r\n \r\n
The following article points out an interesting contradiction.
\nIf your body produces an antibody in response to some germ you are said to be ill.
\nHowever if the same antibodies are found in your body after receiving a vaccine you said to be immune. 
\n
\n
\n
The strangest thing about vaccines\n
\n
Oct3 by
Jon Rappoport \n The strangest thing about vaccines
\n by Jon Rappoport
\n October 3, 2013
\n
www.nomorefakenews.com\n I didn�t say the worst thing. I said the strangest.
\n Here it is: Proponents claim a vaccine stimulates a person�s immune system to produce antibodies, which are immune-system scouts.
\n This is supposedly a rehearsal. The immune system gets a chance to respond to a �test run,� so that when the real disease hits, the immune-defense will be ready and will knock out the disease quickly.
\n Except there are many diagnostic tests for disease that look for antibodies, and if antibodies show up, the doctor tells the patient he has the disease.
\n It�s absurd.
\n
Antibodies from a vaccine=immunity. Same antibodies produced by the body in response to a germ entering the body=illness. \n On top of this insanity, antibodies are only one component of a very complex immune system. The production of antibodies doesn�t guarantee a person�s whole immune system is in good shape.
\n Yes, I know there are many other strange and absurd and destructive and ineffective vaccine-factors, but the above contradiction is surely the strangest.
\n
\n In 1987, when I was writing my first book,
AIDS INC. (note:
AIDS INC. is included in
THE MATRIX REVEALED), I queried the FDA about the development of an HIV vaccine. Here is what I was told: if a vaccine was ever deployed, it would produce antibodies to HIV and the person would be given a letter to carry around with him in case he was ever tested for HIV.
\n The letter would say, this person is immune from HIV. The antibodies are an indication of immunity, not disease.
\n You see, the two standard diagnostic tests for HIV were the Elisa and the Western Blot. They both tested for antibodies. If a person tested positive, he was told he had AIDS.
\n But if the SAME antibodies were produced by the vaccine, he�d be designated immune from AIDS.
\n No, that couldn�t be.
\n Yes, it could be and was.
\n Jon Rappoport
\n The author of two explosive collections,
THE MATRIX REVEALED and
EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at
www.nomorefakenews.com\n
\n
\n
Here is a much longer article that goes into some of what is behind this big vaccine push and the problems will result. \n
\n
https://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2013/1...by-peter-eyre/\r\n
\r\n\r\n Flu Shot Warning\r\n 
\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n <!-' + '- / controls -' + '->\r\n 
\r\n\r\n 
\r\n \r\n 
\r\n\r\n\r\n 
\r\n\r\n \r\n 
Threaded Mode
