I just scanned what articles are brought up, but why do I get the impression that the use of MMS achieves its effects only if we approach the dose that induces nausea?
Let's say such dose is 30 drops, will we not get the same effect if we took 10 drops every hour for 3 hours? (assuming we don't get nauseated with this, the effect being 2 hours)
Just wondering. I may just have to do more thorough reading.
I just scanned what articles are brought up, but why do I get the impression that the use of MMS achieves its effects only if we approach the dose that induces nausea?
Let's say such dose is 30 drops, will we not get the same effect if we took 10 drops every hour for 3 hours? (assuming we don't get nauseated with this, the effect being 2 hours)
Just wondering. I may just have to do more thorough reading.
Gerry
I took 6 + 10 + 10 in one day and got no response.
The following day I took 16 drops and got slight nausea and mild diarrhea, and felt extra good the next day.
10 days later I took 15 drops with no reaction.
I'm not taking it regular because I have no reason to.
__________________
For now we see through a glass, darkly.... 1st Corinthians 13:12
The only time we were winning against malaria was when we had DDT in our arsenal.
Well, DDT along with solutions like simple bed nets and simple low-tech practices aimed toward mosquito control.
While treatment of those already infected is definitely part of any plan, it would all be futile if reinfection is always present. I hope groups like the Malaria Solution realize that DDT should be part of their arsenal, in spite of what leftist environmentalists falsely and unscientifically claim.
Perhaps you could write to the above posted organization and talk to them about it. You have enough science to provide a rational arguement. I agree with you about DDT, even though I'm one of those environmentalist.
Arrow
I base my environmental philisophy upon some core Native American philosophy. Balance, order, leave no trail, the cycle of life and death, and looking down 7 generations. Our actions affect 7 generations. We have work to do on all of these and I do think can be done with economic growth and maintaining freedom. Re-education out of greed is required on a governmental, corporate and personal level. I do not think that many environmentalist understand my stance hence I find them insufferable. My husband says I'm more like an Oregon rancher. Those guys know the land and understand some balance. Ya know, in the small town my husband is from, the folks there are all pretty wealthy. They are sitting pretty but you would never know it by the way they live. You look at the homes and you would never know. They are humble and sincere and have better things to do than collecting endless mindless sh^t.
You science buffs out there - please read and report what you think.
At the very end of the first link it is stated that toxic levels are unknown and that at the time of the writing the author was aware of people taking 2 to 3 doses a week. For some years now people have been taking it in daily doses, some for extended periods of time without symtomatic side effects.
______
Perhaps you could write to the above posted organization and talk to them about it. You have enough science to provide a rational arguement. I agree with you about DDT, even though I'm one of those environmentalist.
Arrow
I also thought the banning of insecticides was a good thing, until I read the book, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Science by Tom Bethell just a few months ago. Among other things (man-made global warming is false, AIDS epidemic in Africa is false, greenest energy is nuclear, etc.), it dealt with the fallacy of the DDT ban, which arose from Carson's Silent Spring which had no scientific basis at all. Things like the thinning egg shells were shown to be unrelated to DDT but to mineral imbalance, egg shells remaining normal even with DDT exposure as long as nutrition was proper.
Well, in short, DDT should not have been banned because it was effective and virtually non-toxic to the environment (except to targetted insects). And the book shows that because of the ban, millions have suffered and died because of malaria (to cite only a single insect-borne disease!), and more continue to suffer and die.
The book also shows that Greenpeace founders now shun Greenpeace! because the group has abandoned science for politics and, as you put it, greed.
It's an interesting book. See if you can read in from your library (as I did :wink: ).
You science buffs out there - please read and report what you think.
At the very end of the first link it is stated that toxic levels are unknown and that at the time of the writing the author was aware of people taking 2 to 3 doses a week. For some years now people have been taking it in daily doses, some for extended periods of time without symtomatic side effects.
______
Thanks for the links. I still have to read the assignment thoroughly.
Quote:
We may be on the verge of discovering the most potent and broad spectrum antibiotic yet known.
Well, our neutrophils have been using it and doing it all this time. :wink: So were our macrophages (see the NO/peroxynitrate thing there? that's another really powerful defense system!).
I would say that what was discovered is a method of safe delivery, being that we cannot take in hypochlorite bleach routinely. Or even peroxide, peroxynitrate, and nitric oxide. By providing an "almost" end product (chlorite instead of hypochlorite), we do not burden our bodies to have to create the substance itself (requiring energy, oxygen and niacin, among others).
As for toxicity, there may be none observed, but only because our bodies are also equipped to handle these substances with superoxide dismutase, glutathione, etc.
I don't doubt any product that goes along with the body's own intelligence. 8)
We are truly "fearfully and wonderfully made." :wink: 8)
If only more healers realize this and go along, instead of against, our normal mechanisms.
As I wrote earlier, I ordered a bottle for my family in the US. It arrived there already. My son, who has some respiratory problem, will be using it this weekend.
My kit for the Philippines still hasn't been shipped. Both orders were placed Sep 27.